Definition
Moving the Goalposts is a method of denial where the criteria for “proof” or acceptance are arbitrarily shifted out of range as soon as the current criteria have been met by evidence. It ensures that an undesirable conclusion is never reached.
Why It Matters
When criteria for success are changed mid-stream, trust and accountability vanish. In science, this is ‘p-hacking’ or post-hoc theorizing; in management, it’s a recipe for burnout. It prevents us from ever actually ‘proving’ anything or achieving a stable state of accomplishment.
Core Concepts
-
Continuous Denial: No amount of evidence is ever “enough.” As soon as a specific claim is debunked, a new, more difficult, or vague requirement is substituted.
-
The “Toxin” Retreat: A common pattern in anti-vaccination rhetoric: “MMR causes autism” “Thimerosal causes it” “Aluminum causes it” “Vague toxins cause it.”
- How to read: “The shift from MMR to thimerosal to aluminum to vague toxins.”
- Meaning: Successive goalpost shifts—each debunked claim is replaced by a harder-to-test alternative, never allowing the overall belief to be falsified.
-
Impossible Criteria: Setting up requirements for proof that cannot possibly be met (e.g., demanding a video of every single step of a long-term evolutionary process).
-
Post-Hoc Redefinition: Changing the definition of success after the fact to maintain a “fail” state for the opposing view.